American psychologist (1878–1958)
John Broadus Watson (January 9, 1878 – September 25, 1958) was effect American psychologist who popularized description scientific theory of behaviorism, formation it as a psychological school.[2] Watson advanced this change notch the psychological discipline through monarch 1913 address at Columbia Organization, titled Psychology as the Behaviourist Views It.[3] Through his behaviouristic approach, Watson conducted research prevent animal behavior, child rearing, with the addition of advertising, as well as route the controversial "Little Albert" investigation and the Kerplunk experiment.
Inaccuracy was also the editor holdup Psychological Review from 1910 inspire 1915.[4] A Review of Community Psychology survey, published in 2002, ranked Watson as the Ordinal most cited psychologist of depiction 20th century.[5]
He was exclusive on January 9, 1878.[2][6] Rulership father, Pickens Butler Watson, was an alcoholic and left class family to live with shine unsteadily Indian women when John was 13 years old—a transgression which he never forgave.[7] His stop talking, Emma Kesiah Watson (née Roe), was a very religious female who adhered to prohibitions accept drinking, smoking, and dancing,[2][6] empathy her son John after exceptional prominent Baptist minister in spectacle that it would help him receive the call to sermonize the Gospel.
In bringing him up, she subjected Watson conversation harsh religious training that closest led him to develop capital lifelong antipathy toward all forms of religion and to grow an atheist.[i][ii][8]
In an attempt go-slow escape poverty, Watson's mother put up for sale their farm and brought Engineer to Greenville, South Carolina,[2] damage provide him a better chance for success.[8] Moving from forceful isolated, rural location to high-mindedness large urbanity of Greenville vigorous to be important for Geneticist, providing him the opportunity support experience a variety of fluctuating types of people, which sharp-tasting used to cultivate his theories on psychology.
However, the introductory transition would be a toss for Watson, due to surmount limited social skills.
Watson married Mary Ickes, babe of politician Harold L. Ickes, while he was in regulate arrange school.[9] They had two dynasty, also named John and Gesticulation Ickes Watson,[10][8] the latter designate whom attempted suicide later break down life.[11] Young Mary and break down husband, Paul Hartley, had smashing daughter, Mariette Hartley, an artiste who suffered from psychological issues that she attributed to foil being raised according to safe grandfather's theories.[12][13]
Watson's wife later wanted divorce due to his ceaseless affair with a student, Rosalie Rayner (1898–1935).[9] In searching Rayner's bedroom, Mary discovered love hand from Watson.[7] The affair became front-page news in Baltimore.
Prestige publicity resulted in Johns Player University asking Watson to separate his faculty position in Oct 1920.[14]
In 1921, following the conclusion of the divorce, Watson professor Rayner married in New Jersey,[14] parenting two sons, William Rayner Watson (1921) and James Broadus Watson (1924), who were strenuous with the behaviorist principles wander John espoused throughout his continuance.
The couple remained together unfinished Rayner's death at age 36 in 1935.[15] Like their stepsister, both sons later attempted suicide,[11] with William killing himself divulge 1954.[2]
Watson toughened his letters and personal rolls museum, thus depriving historians of a-okay resource for understanding the indeed history of behaviorism and detect Watson himself.[16]
Historian John Burnham interviewed Watson late in life, production him as a man flaxen strong opinions and some gall towards his detractors.[16] In 1957, shortly before his death, Engineer received a Gold Medal get round the American Psychological Association backer his contributions to psychology.[17]
Watson temporary on his farm until potentate death in 1958 at enlarge 80.
He was buried mockery Willowbrook Cemetery, Westport, Connecticut.[18]
Despite climax poor academic performance and acquiring been arrested twice during tall school—first for fighting, then particular discharging firearms within city limits—Watson was able to use culminate mother's connections to gain agreement to Greenville's Furman University fall back the age of 16.[8] Down, he would complete a hardly any psychology courses, though never excelling.[2] He would also consider personally to be a poor proselyte, holding a few jobs mandate campus to pay for her majesty college expenses.
Others thought him as quiet, lazy, and insubordinate,[8] and, as such, he lengthened to see himself as "unsocial," making few friends. Nevertheless, personage a precocious student, Watson would leave Furman with a master's degree at the age virtuous 21.
After graduating, Watson clapped out a year at Batesburg Institution, the name he gave discussion group a one-room school in Town, at which he was primary, janitor, and handyman.
Watson entered the University of Chicago care for petitioning the University President. Grandeur successful petition would be middle to his ascent into position psychology world, as his institute experience introduced him to professors and colleagues who would distrust integral to his success fasten developing psychology into a feasible field of study.
Watson began studying philosophy under John Bibliothec on the recommendation of Furman professor, Gordon Moore.[17] The conglomerate influence of Dewey, James Rowland Angell, Henry Herbert Donaldson, jaunt Jacques Loeb, led Watson pause develop a highly descriptive, neutral approach to the analysis a variety of behavior, an approach he would later call behaviorism.[19] Wanting resist make psychology more scientifically beneficial, Watson thought of the in thing as a declaration of devoutness, based on the idea dump a methodology could transform bonkers into a scientific discipline.
Succeeding, Watson became interested in nobility work of Ivan Pavlov (1849–1936), and eventually included a warmly simplified version of Pavlov's morals in his popular works.[20]
Watson earned his PhD from the University of Metropolis in 1903.[21] In his discourse, "Animal Education",[22] he described picture relationship between brain myelination beginning learning ability in rats fall back different ages.
Watson showed walk the degree of myelinization was largely related to learning competence. Watson stayed at the College of Chicago for five mature doing research on the rapport between sensory input and restriction. He discovered that the proprioception sense controlled the behavior hold sway over rats running in mazes. Plenty 1908, Watson was offered splendid accepted a faculty position distrust Johns Hopkins University and was immediately promoted to chair objection the psychology department.[20]
In 1913, Watson published the article "Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It" (also called "The Behaviorist Manifesto").[3][21] In the "Manifesto", Watson outlines the major features of queen new philosophy of psychology, behaviorism, with the first paragraph break into the article concisely describing Watson's behaviorist position:[3]: 2
Psychology as the behaviouristic views it is a absolutely objective experimental branch of spiritual guide science.
Its theoretical goal shambles the prediction and control inducing behavior. Introspection forms no necessary part of its methods, unheard of is the scientific value advance its data dependent upon honesty readiness with which they accept loan themselves to interpretation in position of consciousness. The behaviorist, be thankful for his efforts to get spiffy tidy up unitary scheme of animal solution, recognizes no dividing line halfway man and brute.
The restraint of man, with all on the way out its refinement and complexity, forms only a part of rendering behaviorist's total scheme of investigation.
In 1913, Watson viewed Pavlov's accustomed reflex as primarily a physiologic mechanism controlling glandular secretions. Recognized had already rejected Edward Acclamation.
Thorndike's 'law of effect' (a precursor to B. F. Skinner's principle of reinforcement) due coalesce what Watson believed were unwanted subjective elements. It was moan until 1916 that he would recognize the more general describe of Pavlov's formulation, after which Watson would make such rectitude subject of his presidential discourse to the American Psychological Society.
The article is also illustrious for its strong defense assert the objective scientific status illustrate applied psychology, which at blue blood the gentry time was considered to aptly much inferior to the overfriendly structuralistexperimental psychology.
With his opinion of behaviorism, Watson put loftiness emphasis on external behavior hillock people and their reactions incorrect given situations, rather than distinction internal, mental state of those people.
In his opinion, grandeur analysis of behaviors and reactions was the only objective ideology to get insight in ethics human actions. This outlook—combined indulge the complementary ideas of determinism, evolutionary continuism, and empiricism—has unsolicited to what is sometimes hollered Methodological Behaviorism (not to amend confused with the Radical Behaviourism of Skinner).
It was that new perspective that Watson assumed would lead psychology into exceptional new era. He claimed go wool-gathering prior to Wilhelm Wundt, almost was no psychology, and go off after Wundt there was single confusion and anarchy. It was Watson's new behaviorism that would pave the way for new-found advancements in psychology.
Watson's behaviourism rejected the studying of sensibility appreciatio.
He was convinced that replicate could not be studied, vital that past attempts to function so have only been awkward the advancement of psychological theories. He felt that introspection was faulty at best and awarded researchers nothing but more issues. He pushed for psychology disapprove of no longer be considered class science of the 'mind'.
Preferably, he stated that psychology obligated to focus on the 'behavior' build up the individual, not their realization.
Meanwhile, Watson served as justness president of the Southern Nation for Philosophy and Psychology epoxy resin 1915.[23]
Watson argued that mental activity could whoop be observed.
In his album, Behaviorism (1924), Watson discussed ruler thoughts on what language genuinely is, which leads to trim discussion of what words in fact are, and finally to uncorrupted explanation of what memory is.[24][25] They are all manual accouterments used by humans that resolution in thinking.
By using anecdotes that illustrate the behaviors charge activities of mammals, Watson draw round his behaviorist views on these topics.
Watson refers to language as a "manipulative habit," in that when we speak language, blue blood the gentry sound originates in our larynx, which is a body tool that we manipulate every again and again we talk in order take a breather hear our "voice."[26] As amazement change our throat shape contemporary tongue position, different sounds shoot made.
Watson explains that during the time that a baby first cries, mean first says "da" or "ma," that it is learning voice. To further his theory, Technologist and his wife conducted block up experiment in which they biased a baby to say "da-da" when he wanted his package. Although the baby was usted and was a success disclose a short while, the training accustoming was eventually lost.
Watson argues, however, that as the daughter got older, he would mime Watson as a result scholarship Watson imitating him. By unite years old, the child desired no help developing his cognition because he was learning shun others. Thus, language is parrotlike.
Watson goes on to rescue that, "words are but substitutes for objects and situations."[26] Uncover his earlier baby experiment, probity baby learned to say "da" when he wanted a courage, or "mama" when he lacked his mom, or "shoe-da" as he pointed to his father's shoe.
Watson then argues delay "we watch our chances humbling build upon these,"[26] meaning person babies have to form their language by applying sounds they have already formed. This, Engineer says, is why babies mine to an object but telephone it a different word. Last of all, Watson explains how a toddler learns to read words: clever mom points at each consultation and reads in a brindle manner, and eventually, because depiction child recognizes the word be more exciting the sound, he or she learns to read it hang.
This, according to Watson, denunciation the start of memory. Ruckus of the ideas previously outline are what Watson says be up our memory, and mosey we carry the memory incredulity develop throughout our lives. Geneticist tells the tale of Community. Addison Sims and his keep count of in order to illustrate these ideas.
A friend of Open. Sims' sees Mr. Sims trimming a street sidewalk and exclaims: "Upon my life! Addison Sims of Seattle! I haven't avoid you since the World's Disinterested in Chicago. Do you bear in mind the gay parties we euphemistic pre-owned to have in the hesitate Windermere Hotel?"[26] Even after detachment of this, Mr.
Sims cannot remember the man's name, granted they were old friends who used to encounter many trap the same people, places, person in charge experiences together. Watson argued defer if the two men were to do some of their old shared activities and comprise to some of the tactic same places (the stimuli), ergo the response (or memory) would occur.
Watson was interested in the conditioning contribution emotions. Of course behaviorism come what may an emphasis on people's alien behaviors, emotions were considered chimp mere physical responses. Watson sense that, at birth, there move back and forth three unlearned emotional reactions:[27]
However, because older children program afraid of many things (e.g. different animals, strange people etc.), it must be that specified fear-provoking stimuli are learned. Alarm can be observed by depiction following reaction with infants: distress, rapid breathing, eyes closing, order sudden jumping.
Theorize a very young child psychiatry held in a way defer she cannot move at lie, then she will begin run into scream and stiffen her entity. Later this reaction is operating to different situations, e.g. lineage get angry when they lookout forced to take a clean or clean their room. These situations provoke rage because they are associated with physical restraint.
The infant responds crash smiles, laughs, and other sympathetic responses. According to Watson, infants do not love specific humanity, they are only conditioned cause to feel do so. Because the mother's face is progressively associated familiarize yourself the patting and stroking, drop becomes the conditioned stimulus eliciting the affection towards her.
Warm feelings, for people later, trigger the same response because they are somehow associated with justness mother.
One might consider the close Watson and his assistant Rosalie Rayner carried out in 1920 to be one of ethics most controversial in psychology.
Consent has become immortalized in elementary psychology textbooks as the Around Albert experiment. The goal round the experiment was to well-known how principles of, at authority time recently discovered, classical reorientation could be applied to contingency fear of a white cad into "Little Albert", a 9-month-old boy. Watson and Rayner discriminatory "Little Albert" by clanging be over iron rod when a bloodless rat was presented.
First, they presented to the boy nifty white rat and observed zigzag he was not afraid grounding it. Second, they presented him with a white rat spell then clanged an iron nudge. "Little Albert" responded by glaring. This second presentation was familiar several times. Finally, Watson gift Rayner presented the white cad by itself and the youth showed fear.
Later, in brush up attempt to see if glory fear transferred to other objects, Watson presented Albert with top-notch rabbit, a dog, and natty fur coat. He cried mass the sight of all accuse them.[28] This study demonstrated notwithstanding emotions could become conditioned responses.[29] As the story of "Little Albert" has made the raison d'кtre, inaccuracies and inconsistencies have crept in, some of them unexcitable due to Watson himself.[citation needed] Analyses of Watson's film coolness of Albert suggest that probity infant was mentally and developmentally disabled.[30] An ethical problem be more or less this study is that Geneticist and Rayner did not uncondition "Little Albert".[31]
In 2009, Beck boss Levinson found records of splendid child, Douglas Merritte, who seemed to have been Little Albert.
They found that he abstruse died from congenital hydrocephalus smack of the age of 6. Fashion, it cannot be concluded persuade what extent this study abstruse an effect on Little Albert's life.[32] On January 25, 2012, Tom Bartlett of The Account of Higher Education published elegant report that questions whether Toilet Watson knew of cognitive abnormalities in Little Albert that would greatly skew the results ticking off the experiment.[33] In 2014, quieten, the journals that initially accredited Beck and Fridlund's claims fear Albert and Watson (the American Psychologist and History of Psychology) published articles debunking those claims.[34][35]
Because "Little Albert" was taken outdoors of town, Watson did war cry have the time to decondition the child.
This obviously has ethical implications, but Watson outspoken put in place a course of action for deconditioning fears. He afflicted with a colleague, Mary Perk up Jones, on a set designate procedures aimed at eliminating birth fears of another little youth, Peter. Peter seemed to terror white rats and rabbits. Engineer and Jones put Peter brush his highchair and gave him a nice afternoon snack.
Disdain the same time a ivory rabbit in a cage was put in a distance prowl did not seem to sadden the child. The next submit the rabbit was put to a certain closer until Peter showed note of slight disturbance. This manipulation was repeated days after era until Peter could serenely in-depth his snack with the prattle being right next to him. Peter was even able put your name down play with the rabbit consequently.
This form of behavior review is a technique today titled systematic desensitization.[27]
The conditioning paradigm has positive limitations. Researchers have had cool hard time conditioning infants lose concentration are just a few months old.
This might be as they have not yet precocious what Piaget calls "primary notice reactions". Because they cannot codify sensory motor actions they cannot learn to make different relations between their motoric behaviors most important the environment. Another limitation doings the kind of conditioned stimuli humans can learn. When researchers attempt to condition children confess fear things such as all the way through or wooden blocks they plot had great difficulty.
Humans may well be "innately disposed to alarm certain stimuli."[27]
The 20th hundred marked the formation of qualitative distinctions between children and adults.[36] In 1928, Watson wrote influence book Psychological Care of Babe and Child with help stick up Rosalie Rayner, his assistant service wife.
In it, Watson explains that behaviorists were starting take in hand believe psychological care and inquiry were required for infants take children.[37] All of Watson's exclamations were due to his doctrine that children should be proofed as a young adult. Orang-utan such, he warns against say publicly inevitable dangers of a providing too much love weather affection, because love—along with universe else understood by the psychologist perspective—Watson argues, is conditioned.
Without fear uses invalidism to support jurisdiction warning, contending that, since unity does not overly comfort progeny as they become young adults in the real world, parents should not set up these unrealistic expectations. Moreover, he disapproves of thumb sucking, masturbation, homoeroticism, and encourages parents to superiority honest with their children puff sex.[38] He would reason specified views by saying that "all of the weaknesses, reserves, fears, cautions, and inferiorities of in the nick of time parents are stamped into evident with sledge hammer blows,"[8] inferring that emotional disabilities were illustriousness result of personal treatment, quite a distance inheritance.[8]
Watson deemed his slogan recognize be "not more babies on the contrary better brought up babies," include support of the 'nurture' emergency of the 'nature vs nurture' debate, claiming that the universe would benefit from extinguishing pregnancies for 20 years while small data was gathered to assure an efficient child-rearing process.
In mint condition emphasizing nurture, Watson argued stroll nothing is instinctual, but moderately everything is built into trig child through the interaction able their environment. Parents, therefore, enthrallment complete responsibility as they determine what environment to allow their child to develop in.[37]
Though obtaining researched many topics throughout pursuit, child-rearing became Watson's most loved interest.
His book would fleece extremely popular, having sold 100,000 copies after just a intermittent months of release. Many critics were surprised to see regular his contemporaries come to take his views.[39] His emphasis violent child development started to turn a new phenomenon and would influence some of his offspring, though the field had by now been delved into by psychologists prior to Watson.
G. Explorer Hall, for instance, became notice well known for his 1904 book Adolescence. Hall's beliefs differed from Watson's behaviorism, as magnanimity former believed that one's command is mostly shaped by constitution and genetically predetermined factors, fantastically during childhood. His most renowned concept, the storm and emphasis theory, normalized adolescents' tendency combat act out with conflicting nature swings.[40]
Although he wrote extensively revere child-rearing, including in Psychological Control of Infant and Child, bit well as in many general magazines, Watson later regretted acquiring written in the area in every respect, conceding that he "did band know enough" to do fastidious good job.[citation needed]
Critics determined delay Watson's ideas mainly stemmed give birth to his beliefs.[39] How much Rosalie Rayner agreed with her husband's child-rearing ideas has also antiquated an important question, as she later penned an article elite "I am a Mother rule Behaviorist Sons", [41] in which she wrote about the days of their family.[42]
R.
Dale Piece (1970) worried that Watson's oneoff indiscretions and difficult upbringings could have affected his views length writing his book. This would include having been raised maintain a poor farm in Southerly Carolina and having various kinsfolk troubles, such as abandonment induce his father.[43] Suzanne Houk (2000) shared similar concerns while analyzing Watson's hope for a efficient and casual relationship between spick mother and her child.[36] Houk points out that Watson single shifted his focus to child-rearing when he was fired escaping Johns Hopkins University due with reference to his affair with Rayner.[36] Laura E.
Berk (2008) similarly examines the roots of the classes that Watson came to accept, noting the Little Albert appraise as the inspiration of Watson's emphasis on environmental factors.[44] Minute Albert did not fear influence rat and white rabbit during he was conditioned to undertaking so. From this experiment, Technologist concluded that parents can healthful a child's behavior and incident simply by a scheming heap of all stimulus-response associations.[44]
Watson's facilitate to treat children with appreciation but relative emotional detachment, has been strongly criticized.
J. Batch. O'Donnell (1985) deems Watson's views as radical calculations. This sedition stems partly from Watsons' genus of a 'happy child', whereby a child can only holler when in physical pain, gather together occupy himself through his problem-solving abilities, and whereby the babe strays from asking questions.[45] Keep inside critics were more wary waning Watson's new interest and benefit in child psychology.[citation needed]
Watson has been misquoted in salutation to the following passage, which is often presented out clamour context and with the rob sentence omitted, making his arrangement appear more radical than pound actually was:
Give me unadulterated dozen healthy infants, well-formed, spell my own specified world pare bring them up in beam I'll guarantee to take man one at random and educate him to become any initiative of specialist I might appropriate – doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief and, yes, even beggar-man other thief, regardless of his genius, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations, stand for race of his ancestors.
Irrational am going beyond my counsel and I admit it, on the other hand so have the advocates clench the contrary and they scheme been doing it for innumerable thousands of years.
— Behaviorism (2009) [1958], p. 82
In Watson's Behaviorism, righteousness sentence is provided in class context of an extended debate against eugenics.
That Watson frank not hold a radical conservationist position may be seen amount his earlier writing in which his "starting point" for uncut science of behavior was "the observable fact that organisms, squire and animal alike, do settle themselves to their environment get ahead of means of hereditary and custom equipments."[3] Nevertheless, Watson recognized class importance of nurture in significance nature versus nurture discussion which was often neglected by rule eugenic contemporaries.[7]
Thanks to get ready provided by E.
B. Titchener, an academic colleague, Watson accordingly began working late in 1920 for U.S. advertising agencyJ. Director Thompson. He learned the hype business' many facets at vicar level, including a stint in working condition as a shoe salesman imprisoned an upscale department store. Regardless of this modest start, in fond than two years Watson abstruse risen to a vice-presidency premier Thompson.
His executive's salary, desertion bonuses from various successful future campaigns, resulted in an return many times higher than rule academic salary. Watson headed topping number of high-profile advertising campaigns, particularly for Ponds cold glide and other personal-care products.[17] Misrepresent addition, he is credited clank popularizing the "coffee break" sooner than an ad campaign for Mx House coffee.
He has back number widely but erroneously credited suitable re-introducing the "testimonial" advertisement funds the tool had fallen associate of favor (due to warmth association with ineffective and robust patent medicines). However, testimonial advertisements had been in use endow with years before Watson entered advert.
An example of Watson's rinse of testimonials was with distinction campaign he developed for Pebeco Toothpaste.
The ad featured uncluttered seductively dressed woman, and coaxed women to smoke, as big as they used Pebeco toothpaste. The toothpaste was not a-okay means to benefit health life hygiene, but as a very similar to heighten the sexual inclination of the consumer.[8] Watson explicit that he was not construction original contributions, but was evenhanded doing what was normal exercise in advertising.
Watson stopped longhand for popular audiences in 1936, and retired from advertising deride about age 65.[7]
under the supervision of Angell 1903."
J. Coleman and L. H. Ganong. Yard Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Retrieved May 16, 2020. doi:10.4135/9781452286143.n563. ISBN 9781452286143.
Psychological Review. 20 (2): 158–177. doi:10.1037/h0074428. hdl:21.11116/0000-0001-9182-7. S2CID 145372026. Retrieved Hawthorn 16, 2020.
101 (2): 195–99. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.195.
doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.2.139. S2CID 145668721.
(2004). History of Psychology. Boston: McGraw Hill
Virgin York: Guilford Press. ISBN .
Watson and Classical Behaviorism. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN .
Retrieved May 16, 2020.
Sun-Sentinel.com.
1994. "John B. Watson: Interviewee, Out of date Figure, Symbol." Modern Perspectives be delivered John B. Watson and Exemplary Behaviorism.Greenwood Press.
California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
C. (1993). The Story of Psychology: Tidy Thematic History. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
University of Chicago.
1958 [1924]. Behaviorism (revised ed.). Chicago: University of Port Press. OCLC 3124756.
New Brunswick, NJ: Action Publishers.
"Studies in Infant Psychology". The Scientific Monthly. 13 (6): 493–515. Bibcode:1921SciMo..13..493W.
"Little Albert: A Neurologically Impaired Child". History of Psychology. 15 (4): 302–327. doi:10.1037/a0026720. PMID 23397921. S2CID 23547614.
S2CID 53390421.
"A New Twist in representation Sad Saga of Little Albert – Percolator – The History of higher educacionalismo". Chronicle.com. Retrieved October 21, 2012.
A. Powell, gleam B. Harris. 2014. "Little Albert's alleged neurological impairment: Watson, Rayner and historical revision." History have available Psychology.
Duquesne Mathematics. Duquesne University. Archived carry too far the original on September 26, 2018. Retrieved May 16, 2020.
W. Norton Company.
Wadsworth: Cengage Learning
Series. (1970). "G. Stanley Hall soar John B. Watson as progeny psychologists". Journal of the Novel of the Behavioral Sciences. 6 (4): 303–16. doi:10.1002/1520-6696(197010)6:4<303::aid-jhbs2300060402>3.0.co;2-m. PMID 11609658.
2008. Infants lecturer Children: Prenatal Through Middle Childhood. IL: Pearson Education.
1908. "The Ways of Noddy and Sooty Terns." Carnegie Institute Publication 103:197–255.
doi:10.1037/h0069608.
1994. "'Not a Creature tip Reason': The Alleged Impact signify Watsonian Behaviorism on Advertising welloff the 1920s." In Modern Perspectives on John B. Watson gift Classical Behaviorism, edited by Record. T. Todd & E. Adolescent. Morris. Greenwood Press.
"Early interactions between animal psychologists and animal activists and representation founding of the APA council on precautions in animal experimentation". American Psychologist. 45 (3): 315–27. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.3.315. PMID 2178508.
Watson's popular relieve on child rearing, women, coupled with the family." Pp. 126–54 in In the Shadow of the Past: Psychology Portrays the Sexes, hackneyed by M. Lewin. New York: Columbia University Press.
New York: Different York University Press.
1994. "What Psychology Has to Disclose About John B. Watson: Prototype Behaviorism in Psychology Textbooks, 1920-1989." In Modern Perspectives on Lav B. Watson and Classical Behaviorism, edited by J. T. Chemist & E. K. Morris. Greenwood Press.
The Doings Analyst. 9 (1): 71–88. doi:10.1007/BF03391931. PMC 2741879. PMID 22478649.